10
THE TRUTH AT LAST:
THE WORK OF PAUL RASSINIER
Without doubt the most important
contribution to a truthful study of the extermination question has been
the work of the French historian, Professor Paul Rassinier. The pre-eminent
value of this work lies firstly in the fact that Rassinier actually experienced
life in the German concentration camps, and also that, as a Socialist intellectual
and anti-Nazi, nobody could be less inclined to defend Hitler and National
Socialism. Yet, for the sake of justice and historical truth, Rassinier
spent the remainder of his post-war years until his death in 1966 pursuing
research which utterly refuted the Myth of the Six Million and the legend
of Nazi diabolism. From 1933 until 1943, Rassinier was a professor of history
in the College d'enseignement général at Belfort, Academie
de Besancon. During the war he engaged in resistance activity until he
was arrested by the Gestapo on October 30th, 1943, and as a result was
confined in the German concentration camps at Buchenwald and Dora until
1945. At Buchenwald, towards the end of the war, he contracted typhus,
which so damaged his health that he could not resume his teaching. After
the war, Rassinier was awarded the Medaille de la Résistance and
the Reconnaisance Francaise, and was elected to the French Chamber of Deputies,
from which he was ousted by the Communists in November, 1946. Rassinier
then embarked on his great work, a systematic analysis of alleged German
war atrocities, in particular the supposed "extermination" of the Jews.
Not surprisingly, his writings are little known; they have rarely been
translated from the French and none at all have appeared in English. His
most important works were: Le Mensonge d'Ulysse (The Lies of Odysseus,
Paris, 1949), an investigation of concentration camp conditions based on
his own experiences of them; and Ulysse trahi par les Siens (1960), a sequel
which further refuted the impostures of propagandists concerning German
concentration camps. His monumental task was completed with two final volumes,
Le Véritable Proces Eichmann (1962) and Le Drame des Juifs européen
(1964), in which Rassinier exposes the dishonest and reckless distortions
concerning the fate of the Jews by a careful statistical analysis. The
last work also examines the political and financial significance of the
extermination legend and its exploitation by Israel and the Communist powers.
One of the many merits of Rassinier's work is exploding the myth of unique
German "wickedness"; and he reveals with devastating force how historical
truth has been obliterated in an impenetrable fog of partisan propaganda.
His researches demonstrate conclusively that the fate of the Jews during
World War Two, once freed from distortion and reduced to proper proportions,
loses its much vaunted "enormity" and is seen to be only one act in a greater
and much wider tragedy. In an extensive lecture tour in West Germany in
the spring of 1960, Professor Rassinier emphasised to his German audiences
that it was high time for a rebirth of the truth regarding the extermination
legend, and that the Germans themselves should begin it since the allegation
remained a wholly unjustifiable blot on Germany in the eyes of the world.
THE IMPOSTURE OF 'GAS CHAMBERS'
Rassinier entitled his first book
The Lies of Odysseus in commemoration of the fact that travellers always
return bearing tall stories, and until his death he investigated all the
stories of extermination literature and attempted to trace their authors.
He made short work of the extravagant claims about gas chambers at Buchenwald
in David Rousset's The Other Kingdom (New York, 1947); himself an inmate
of Buchenwald, Rassinier proved that no such things ever existed there
(Le Mensonge d'Ulysse, p. 209 ff) Rassinier also traced Abbe Jean-Paul
Renard, and asked him how he could possibly have testified in his book
Chaines et Lumieres that gas chambers were in operation at Buchenwald.
Renard replied that others had told him of their existence, and hence he
had been willing to pose as a witness of things that he had never seen
(ibid, p. 209 ff). Rassinier also investigated Denise Dufournier's Ravensbrück.-
The Women's Camp of Death (London, 1948) and again found that the authoress
had no other evidence for gas chambers there than the vague "rumours" which
Charlotte Bormann stated were deliberately spread by communist political
prisoners. Similar investigations were made of such books as Philip Friedman's
This was Auschwitz: The Story of a Murder Camp (N.Y., 1946) and Eugen Kogon's
The Theory and Practice of Hell (N.Y., 1950), and he found that none of
these authors could produce an authentic eye-witness of a gas chamber at
Auschwitz, nor had they themselves actually seen one. Rassinier mentions
Kogon's claim that a deceased former inmate, Janda Weiss, had said to Kogon
alone that she had witnessed gas chambers at Auschwitz, but of course,
since this person was apparently dead, Rassinier was unable to investigate
the claim. He was able to interview Benedikt Kautsky, author of Teufel
und Verdammte who had alleged that millions of Jews were exterminated at
Auschwitz. However, Kautsky only confirmed to Rassinier the confession
in his book, namely that never at any time had he seen a gas chamber, and
that he based his information on what others had "told him". The palm for
extermination literature is awarded by Rassinier to Miklos Nyizli's Doctor
at Auschwitz, in which the falsification of facts, the evident contradictions
and shameless lies show that the author is speaking of places which it
is obvious he has never seen (Le Drame des Juifs européen, p. 52).
According to this "doctor of Auschwitz", 25,000 victims were exterminated
every day for four and a half years, which is a grandiose advance on Olga
Lengyel's 24,000 a day for two and a half years. It would mean a total
of forty-one million victims at Auschwitz by 1945, two and a half times
the total pre-war Jewish population of the world. When Rassinier attempted
to discover the identity of this strange "witness", he was told that "he
had died some time before the publication of the book." Rassinier is convinced
that he was never anything but a mythical figure. Since the war, Rassinier
has, in fact, toured Europe in search of somebody who was an actual eye-witness
of gas chamber exterminations in German concentration camps during World
War Two, but he has never found even one such person. He discovered that
not one of the authors of the many books charging that the Germans had
exterminated millions of Jews had even seen a gas chamber built for such
purposes, much less seen one in operation, nor could any of these authors
produce a living authentic witness who had done so. Invariably, former
prisoners such as Renard, Kautsky and Kogon based their statements not
upon what they had actually seen, but upon what they "heard", always from
"reliable" sources, who by some chance are almost always dead and thus
not in a position to confirm or deny their statements. Certainly the most
important fact to emerge from Rassinier's studies, and of which there is
now no doubt at all, is the utter imposture of "gas chambers". Serious
investigations carried out in the sites themselves have revealed with irrefutable
proof that, contrary to the declarations of the surviving "witnesses" examined
above, no gas chambers whatever existed in the German camps at Buchenwald,
Bergen-Belsen, Ravensbrück, Dachau and Dora, or Mauthausen in Austria.
This fact, which we noted earlier was attested to by Stephen Pinter of
the U.S. War Office, has now been recognised and admitted officially by
the Institute of Contemporary History at Munich. However, Rassinier points
out that in spite of this, "witnesses" again declared at the Eichmann trial
that they had seen prisoners at Bergen-Belsen setting out for the gas chambers.
So far as the eastern camps of Poland are concerned, Rassinier shows that
the sole evidence attesting to the existence of gas chambers at Treblinka,
Chelmno, Belzec, Maidanek and Sobibor are the discredited memoranda of
Kurt Gerstein referred to above. His original claim, it will be recalled
was that an absurd 40 million people had been exterminated during the war,
while in his first signed memorandum he reduced the number to 25 million.
Further reductions were made in his second memorandum. These documents
were considered of such dubious authenticity that they were not even admitted
by the Nuremberg Court, though they continue to circulate in three different
versions, one in German (distributed in schools) and two in French, none
of which agree with each other. The German version featured as "evidence"
at the Eichmann Trial in l961. Finally, Professor Rassinier draws attention
to an important admission by Dr. Kubovy, director of the World Centre of
Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Tel-Aviv, made in La Terre Retrouvée,
December 15th, 1960. Dr. Kubovy recognised that not a single order for
extermination exists from Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich or Goering (Le Drame
des Juifs européen, p. 31, 39).
'SIX MILLION' FALSEHOOD REJECTED
As for the fearful propaganda figure
of the Six Million, Professor Rassinier rejects it on the basis of an extremely
detailed statistical analysis. He shows that the number has been falsely
established, on the one hand through inflation of the pre-war Jewish population
by ignoring all emigration and evacuation, and on the other by a corresponding
deflation of the number of survivors after 1945. This was the method used
by the World Jewish Congress. Rassinier also rejects any written or oral
testimony to the Six Million given by the kind of "witnesses" cited above,
since they are full of contradictions, exaggerations and falsehoods. He
gives the example of Dachau casualties, noting that in 1946, Pastor Niemöller
reiterated Auerbach's fraudulent "238,000" deaths there, while in 1962
Bishop Neuhäusseler of Munich stated in a speech at Dachau that only
30,000 people died "of the 200,000 persons from thirty-eight nations who
were interned there" (Le Drame des Juifs européen, p . 12). Today,
the estimate has been reduced by several more thousands, and so it goes
on. Rassinier concludes, too, that testimony in support of the Six Million
given by accused men such as Hoess, Hoettl, Wisliceny and Hoellriegel,
who were faced with the prospect of being condemned to death or with the
hope of obtaining a reprieve, and who were frequently tortured during their
detention, is completely untrustworthy. Rassinier finds it very significant
that the figure of Six Million was not mentioned in court during the Eichmann
trial. "The prosecution at the Jerusalem trial was considerably weakened
by its central motif, the six million European Jews alleged to have been
exterminated in gas chambers. It was an argument that easily won conviction
the day after the war ended, amidst the general state of spiritual and
material chaos. Today, many documents have been published which were not
available at the time of the Nuremberg trials, and which tend to prove
that if the Jewish nationals were wronged and persecuted by the Hitler
regime, there could not possibly have been six millions victims" (ibid,
p. 125). With the help of one hundred pages of cross-checked statistics,
Professor Rassinier concludes in Le Drame des Juifs européen that
the number of Jewish casualties during the Second World War could not have
exceeded 1,200,000, and he notes that this has finally been accepted as
valid by the World Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Paris.
However, he regards such a figure as a maximum limit, and refers to the
lower estimate of 896,892 casualties in a study of the same problem by
the Jewish statistician Raul Hilberg. Rassinier points out that the State
of Israel nevertheless continues to claim compensation for six million
dead, each one representing an indemnity of 5,000 marks.
EMIGRATION: THE FINAL SOLUTION
Prof. Rassinier is emphatic in stating
that the German Government never had any policy other than the emigration
of Jews overseas. He shows that after the promulgation of the Nuremberg
Race Laws in September 1935, the Germans negotiated with the British for
the transfer of German Jews to Palestine on the basis of the Balfour Declaration.
When this failed, they asked other countries to take charge of them, but
these refused (ibid, p. 20). The Palestine project was revived in 1938,
but broke down because Germany could not negotiate their departure on the
basis of 3,000,000 marks, as demanded by Britain, without some agreement
for compensation. Despite these difficulties, Germany did manage to secure
the emigration of the majority of their Jews, mostly to the United States.
Rassinier also refers to the French refusal of Germany's Madagascar plan
at the end of 1940. "In a report of the 21st August, 1942, the Secretary
of State for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Third Reich, Luther,
decided that it would be possible to negotiate with France in this direction
and described conversations which had taken place between July and December
1940, and which were brought to a halt following the interview with Montoire
on 13th December 1940 by Pierre-Etienne Flandin, Laval's successor. During
the whole of 1941 the Germans hoped that they would be able to re-open
these negotiations and bring them to a happy conclusion" (ibid, p . 108).
After the outbreak of war, the Jews, who, as Rassinier reminds us, had
declared economic and financial war on Germany as early as 1933, were interned
in concentration camps, "which is the way countries all over the world
treat enemy aliens in time of war . . . It was decided to regroup them
and put them to work in one immense ghetto which, after the successful
invasion of Russia, was situated towards the end of 1941 in the so-called
Eastern territories near the former frontier between Russia and Poland:
at Auschwitz, Chelmno, Belzec, Maidanek, Treblinka etc . . . There they
were to wait until the end of the war for the re-opening of international
discussions which would decide their future" (Le Véritable Proces
Eichmann, p. 20). The order for this concentration in the eastern ghetto
was given by Goering to Heydrich, as noted earlier, and it was regarded
as a prelude to "the desired final solution," their emigration overseas
after the war had ended.
ENORMOUS FRAUD
Of great concern to Professor Rassinier
is the way in which the extermination legend is deliberately exploited
for political and financial advantage, and in this he finds Israel and
the Soviet Union to be in concert. He notes how, after 1950, an avalanche
of fabricated extermination literature appeared under the stamp of two
organisations, so remarkably synchronised in their activities that one
might well believe them to have been contrived in partnership. One was
the "Committee for the Investigation of War Crimes and Criminals" established
under Communist auspices at Warsaw, and the other, the "World Centre of
Contemporary Jewish Documentation" at Paris and Tel-Aviv. Their publications
seem to appear at favourable moments in the political climate, and for
the Soviet Union their purpose is simply to maintain the threat of Nazism
as a manoeuvre to divert attention from their own activities. As for Israel,
Rassinier sees the myth of the Six Million as inspired by a purely material
problem. In Le Drame des Juifs européen (P. 31, 39). he writes:
" . . . It is simply a question of justifying by a proportionate number
of corpses the enormous subsidies which Germany has been paying annually
since the end of the war to the State of Israel by way of reparation for
injuries which moreover she cannot be held to have caused her either morally
or legally, since there was no State of Israel at the time the alleged
deeds took place; thus it is a purely and contemptibly material problem.
"Perhaps I may be allowed to recall here that the State of Israel was only
founded in May 1948 and that the Jews were nationals of all states with
the exception of Israel, in order to underline the dimensions of a fraud
which defies description in any language; on the one hand Germany pays
to Israel sums which are calculated on six million dead, and on the other,
since at least four-fifths of these six million were decidedly alive at
the end of the war, she is paying substantial sums by way of reparation
to the victims of Hitler's Germany to those who are still alive in countries
all over the world other than Israel and to the rightful claimants of those
who have since deceased, which means that for the former (i.e. the six
million), or in other words, for the vast majority, she is paying twice."
CONCLUSION
Here we may briefly summarise the
data on Jewish war- time casualties. Contrary to the figure of over 9 million
Jews in German- occupied territory put forward at the Nuremberg and Eichmann
trials, it has already been estabhshed that after extensive emigration,
approximately 3 million were living in Europe, excluding the Soviet Union.
Even when the Jews of German-occupied Russia are included (the majority
of Russian Jews were evacuated beyond German control), the overall number
probably does not exceed four million. Himmler's statistician, Dr. Richard
Korherr and the World Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation put the
number respectively at 5,550,000 and 5,294,000 when German- occupied territory
was at its widest, but both these figures include the two million Jews
of the Baltic and western Russia without paying any attention to the large
number of these who were evacuated. However, it is at least an admission
from the latter organisation that there were not even six million Jews
in Europe and western Russia combined. Nothing better illustrates the declining
plausibility of the Six Million legend than the fact that the prosecution
at the Eichmann trial deliberately avoided mentioning the figure. Moreover,
official Jewish estimates of the casualties are being quietly revised downwards.
Our analysis of the population and emigration statistics, as well as the
studies by the Swiss Baseler Nachrichten and Professor Rassinier, demonstrate
that it would have been simply impossible for the number of Jewish casualties
to have exceeded a limit of one and a half million. It is very significant,
therefore, that the World Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation in
Paris now states that only 1,485,292 Jews died from all causes during the
Second World War, and although this figure is certainly too high, at least
it bears no resemblance at all to the legendary Six Million. As has been
noted earlier, the Jewish statistician Raul Hilberg estimates an even lower
figure of 896,892. This is beginning to approach a realistic figure, and
the process of revision is certain to continue. Doubtless, several thousand
Jewish persons did die in the course of the Second World War, but this
must be seen in the context of a war that cost many millions of innocent
victims on all sides. To put the matter in perspective, for example, we
may point out that 700,000 Russian civilians died during the siege of Leningrad,
and a total of 2,05O,OOO German civilians were killed in Allied air raids
and forced repatriation after the war. In 1955, another neutral Swiss source,
Die Tat of Zurich (January 19th, 1955), in a survey of all Second World
War casualties based on figures of the lnternational Red Cross, put the
"Loss of victims of persecution because of politics, race or religion who
died in prisons and concentration camps between 1939 and 1945" at 300,000,
not all of whom were Jews, and this figure seems the most accurate assessment.
IMAGINARY SLAUGHTER
The question most pertinent to the
extermination legend is, of course: how many of the 3 million European
Jews under German control survived after 1945? The Jewish Joint Distribution
Committee estimated the number of survivors in Europe to be only one and
a half million, but such a figure is now totally unacceptable. This is
proved by the growing number of Jews claiming compensation from the West
German Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945.
By 1965, the number of these claimants registered with the West German
Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000 (Aufbau, June
30th, 1965). Nothing could be a more devastating proof of the brazen fantasy
of the Six Million. Most of these claimants are Jews, so there can be no
doubt that the majority of the 3 million Jews who experienced the Nazi
occupation of Europe are, in fact, very much alive. It is a resounding
confirmation of the fact that Jewish casualties during the Second World
War can only be estimated at a figure in thousands. Surely this is enough
grief for the Jewish people? Who has the right to compound it with vast
imaginary slaughter, marking with eternal shame a great European nation,
as well as wringing fraudulent monetary compensation from them? RICHARD
HARWOOD is a writer and specialist in political and diplomatic aspects
of the Second World War. At present he is with the University of London.
Mr. Harwood turned to the vexed subject of war crimes under the influence
of Professor Paul Rassineir, to whose monumental work this little volume
is greatly indebted. The author is now working on a sequel in this series
on the Main Nuremberg Trial, 1945 -1946. |